Urban issues take the lead at Sacramento broadband meetings


Not this meeting. Ours took longer and no decision was made. But at least we were co-ed.

Digital literacy and broadband adoption – the wired kind anyway – were high on most priority lists in Sacramento this week. Broadband infrastructure, well, not so much. For four days, various (directly and indirectly) state-funded broadband groups met with agency and legislative staff, policy makers and telecoms companies. Much of the talk was about social service and educational programs, and how to fund them.

Broadband week, as many were calling it, kicked off Monday with an assembly committee hearing regarding digital haves and have nots. To the extent those testifying advocated, it was in favor of chairman Steven Bradford’s (D-Los Angeles) plan to shift money away from rural infrastructure construction and towards wiring urban public house projects and providing equipment and training to residents. Telecoms company representatives liked the idea – it would mean less competition and more customers for them – as did committee vice chair Jim Patterson (R-Fresno).

The conversation on Tuesday ranged more widely. Leaders from regional broadband consortia funded by the California Public Utilities Commission talked about progress made over the past year toward their shared goals, including infrastructure development and adoption of Internet service. Much of the same ground was covered Wednesday morning by the California Broadband Council, although the emphasis was decidedly back on urban access and adoption. AT&T’s decision to invest in expanding mobile service rather than upgrading wired plant also took heat.

Thursday, the stage shifted to the California Emerging Technology Fund, which hosted people involved in its projects and CPUC consortia. Representatives from federal and state agencies with money to spend on broadband and organizations with ideas for doing so rallied the crowd.

Gruffer broadband infrastructure projects were overshadowed by the “adorable puppies” of adoption, education and other socially-oriented programs. Both have their uses, though. As Harold Feld, the rousing keynote speaker from Public Knowledge, a Washington public interest law firm, reminded us, “what you really want to be is a puppy who can chew their ass off.”

Posted in CASF Funding Tagged with: , ,

Recent posts

Maybe Comcast and Charter will get a junction named after them too.\n\nCharter Communication\'s bid to buy two rival cable companies, Time Warner and Bri...
Not much point if no one pays attention.\n\nPermit applications for new cellular towers and other wireless telecoms facilities will be deemed granted in...
\n\nAs it accepted $2.6 billion in federal subsidies over six years to improve rural broadband service, AT&T told the Federal Communications Commiss...
How much of it looks like this?\n\nThe condition of AT&T\'s and Verizon\'s copper telephone networks in California will be independently examined. By ...
\n\nThe two biggest incumbent telephone companies in California will be taking federal subsidies to upgrade rural broadband service. Yesterday was the d...
\n\nA fast track for wireless facilities permits is one step closer to reality in California. Assembly bill 57 was approved by the state senate and sent...
\n\nA streamlined version of a decision aimed at accelerating an investigation of AT&T\'s and Verizon\'s wireline networks is on the table at the Cali...
Ready for an upgrade?\n\nAT&T and Verizon have until Thursday to claim billions of dollars in subsidies to upgrade broadband in rural areas of the U...
What was the question?\n\nVerizon will have to explain, on paper and in person, why its copper telephone networks are rotting on the poles in California...
A gig is a lot faster than 20 mules.\n\nOne of the fastest and cheapest ways to get gigabit service to your home is to move to Boron, California. Race T...

Activity

Tweets

Check you Internet Connection Speed

Speedtest.net Mini requires at least version 8 of Flash. Please update your client.